Kauai Access Problems

Two good pieces worth reading about the controversy over shoreline access on Kauai. First, there's this article from The Hawaii Independent, which begins:

An outcry over plans to fence off a trail to Larsen’s Beach is causing Kauai residents to revisit two longstanding issues: Should concerns about liability restrict access; and is the county properly recording public easements?

The controversy arose over cattle rancher Bruce Laymon’s plans to install a fence on northeast Kauai coastal land that he leases from the Waioli Corp., a kamaaina landowner whose holdings include the historic Waioli Mission House and Grove Farm Homestead Museum.

The fence would block the widest and easiest of two trails that lead down to the long, relatively secluded beach. Laymon maintains the more popular trail is not the easement that Waioli Corp. deeded over to the county. Instead, the public access runs through an outcropping of rocks along a steeper, rougher trail that is less favored by beach-goers.

But during a site visit last Friday, concerned citizens said they were stunned to hear surveyor Alan Hironaka claim there’s no public access to Larsen’s Beach at all...

Click here to read the rest.

Then we have Andy Parx's "got windmills?" blog post, which also goes into the history and politics behind the Larsen Beach access issue.

Check out Andy's piece, The Road More Traveled (Mon., Oct. 26) here.

So has the Honolulu Advertiser or Star-Bulletin been on top of this story? I could be wrong, but I don't think so. More and more we're seeing independent news sources and bloggers picking up the slack while TV news and the dailies cut back on actual reporting, and run more Mainland-generated content.

B&B Pros and Cons: Trick or Treat?

Is the bed and breakfast debate in Hawaii a beach access issue?

As many of you know, I have mixed feelings about the arguments for and against B&Bs. Some of our friends and BAH supporters own B&Bs in Kailua. But I also know people who have been negatively affected by B&Bs.

Ironically, some of the most vocal opponents of B&Bs are people who live on gated roads. They even claim the influx of B&B tourists are one reason they don’t want anyone using “their” private lanes to get to the beach. They want the City Council to tell others what they can or can’t do with their homes.

Yet those same people don’t want anyone telling THEM what they should do with their “private” roads -- despite the fact they receive public services such as trash pick-up and mail deliveries.

Moreover, some of those mini-hotels that are marketed as B&Bs are on gated roads. Which means tourists who rent them have their own private access to the beach, while residents who live nearby must trek as much as half a mile to find a public right of way.

Personally, I’d like to see B&Bs restricted to owner-occupied homes. Most of the problems I hear involve properties where the owner lives out of state or somewhere else. If the owner is present, at least you know who to complain to. I think owner-occupied B&Bs can fit into residential areas if they are regulated and stay true to the spirit of real mom-and-pop operations.

It’s a thorny issue. I’ve had family visiting from the Mainland, and I wanted to set them up with a B&B in Kailua. However, I have friends who have had trouble finding affordable rentals, in part, because B&Bs are more profitable for property owners. If I had an extra room to rent, I'd want to get top dollar for it too.

Is there a middle ground? I’m all for keeping Kailua residential. But without tourists, I think many of the small businesses in town would suffer or close down. Then we all lose out -- the biz owners and residents who shop or dine at those places.

You can post public comments here, but you must register so we don’t get nasty “anonymous” comments. As we’ve seen in the past, those kind of personal attacks don’t get us anywhere.